data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a481a/a481acc60107d0d408e46d9580188a2bbf28aa72" alt="Amd firepro w4100 vs nvidia quadro k620"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d47bb/d47bbe4040c3f8bae0aeb031b7a79cc3350245d0" alt="amd firepro w4100 vs nvidia quadro k620 amd firepro w4100 vs nvidia quadro k620"
Note that the passive adapter is only single-link and thus can only drive a display with a maximum resolution of either 1920x1200 at 60Hz (16x10 aspect ratio) or 1920x1080 (16x9). It also includes a single Passive mini Display Port to DVI-D Single Link adapter. This card features 4 mini Display Port 1.2a interfaces capable of driving 4 4K displays natively. I notice LightRoom, PhotoShop and Premiere CC were all subjectively more "snappy" after replacing a FirePro 2270 with this card. As other reviewers here have noted this card is a slightly better performer than the current generation of iGFX integrated video cards on the Ivy Bridge, Haswell and Skylake platforms which support up to three displays (but not 10-bit workflows). Only the Quadro and FirePro models from AMD & NVidia respectively providing the 10-bit color workflow that quadruples the color space and tonality required for accurate gradation. Pros: For those that use computers for Digital Media creation this is a good solid card. Sapphire: AMD Firepro Products Mini BrochureĪdditional Information Date First Available Support for Microsoft Windows 8.1, Windows 7 and Linux (32-/64-bit)įCC, CE, C-Tick, BSMI, KCC, UL, VCCI, RoHS and WEEE complianceġ x DisplayPort to Single-Link DVI (Passive) Internet connection for driver installationĪpplication optimizations and certificationsĪMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) GPU architectureĤK display resolution (up to 4096 x 2160) Microsoft Windows 10, Windows 8.1 and Windows 7 (32- or 64-bit)Īvailable PCIe x16 slot, 3.0 for optimal performance
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d0ad/9d0ad4bf2aab629c7b2080377f4f65e583874e62" alt="amd firepro w4100 vs nvidia quadro k620 amd firepro w4100 vs nvidia quadro k620"
while i would think it would work with the gtx, i can't confirm any reports of people using them together.Learn more about the AMD 100-505979 Model Brand the firepro starting at $120 seems to be the cheapest solution. so if you only have hdmi available on your 4k monitor, you would also need a displayport to hdmi 2.0 adapter/cable. The amd firepro w2100, w4100 and nvidia quadro k620 cards have displayport outputs not hdmi. Some of the more expensive ones support 4k 60hz, but depending on sdi or hdmi connections can cost $600-$1k. HDMI - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaīlackmagic Design: Intensity Pro 4K Tech Specs Looks like the blackmagic intensity pro 4k is only hdmi 1.4b, not 2.0. 10bit output has always been limited to quadro versions, i haven't seen any reports of the titan x supporting 10bit. that places the gtx 980 ti in the best value spot for these top end cards. the gtx 980 ti is a slightly stripped down version of the chip, but is alot closer to the titan x vs 980 in general benchmarks. the quadro version is $5000, which makes a gtx+i/o card a better value.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29a36/29a36fc5cf2c7de3275fa036e580c79cedece037" alt="amd firepro w4100 vs nvidia quadro k620 amd firepro w4100 vs nvidia quadro k620"
The gtx titan x, gtx 980 ti, and quadro m6000 all have the same chip inside, so their performance is somewhat similar.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a481a/a481acc60107d0d408e46d9580188a2bbf28aa72" alt="Amd firepro w4100 vs nvidia quadro k620"